在SCI论文的 结论（Conclusion） 部分，需简明扼要地总结研究的核心发现、理论意义和应用价值，同时体现学术严谨性。以下是具体注意事项和写作技巧：

一、核心内容框架

总结主要发现

用1-2句概括研究结果（避免重复Results细节） ▸ "This study demonstrates that X significantly improves Y under high-temperature conditions."强调创新性（如方法、理论或应用的突破） ▸ "To our knowledge, this is the first evidence that..." 解释研究意义

连接引言中的研究背景，说明如何填补知识空白 ▸ "These findings resolve the long-standing debate about..."点明理论或实际应用价值 ▸ "Our results provide a mechanistic basis for developing Z-targeted therapies." 指出局限性

客观说明研究的不足（如样本量、实验条件等） ▸ "The generalizability of our conclusions is limited by..."避免过度自我否定，需平衡表述 ▸ 错误："Our study has no practical use." ▸ 正确："Further validation in larger cohorts is needed." 提出未来方向

基于局限性或新发现，建议下一步研究 ▸ "Future work should explore whether X exhibits similar effects in humans."可提及潜在扩展领域 ▸ "It would be valuable to investigate the role of X in other disease contexts."

二、写作技巧与注意事项

语言风格

时态：核心结论用现在时（"This study shows..."）；局限性/建议用情态动词（"may", "should"）篇幅：通常为全文的5-10%，避免冗长（例如：8000词论文的Conclusion约400-800词）逻辑连贯：用连接词串联层次（"Furthermore", "However", "Therefore"） 避免常见错误

❌ 重复Results内容（应提炼升华，而非复述数据）❌ 引入新数据或引用（属于Discussion的范畴）❌ 夸大结论（避免使用"prove"；改用"suggest"或"indicate"）❌ 过度泛化（如"This solves all problems related to..."） 与Abstract和Discussion的区别

Abstract：仅概述结论，不展开讨论Discussion：详细分析结果与文献的关系Conclusion：聚焦核心贡献，提出最终观点

三、范例分析

模板结构：

"In conclusion, our study reveals [核心发现]. This challenges the conventional view that [旧观点], and provides new insights into [领域]. Although [局限性], these findings suggest that [应用方向]. Future research should focus on [具体建议]."

实际案例（改编自Nature论文）：

"In summary, we identify a previously unknown role of mitochondrial dynamics in regulating stem cell senescence. Our data establish that X protein acts as a critical modulator of this process, offering a potential therapeutic target for age-related degenerative diseases. While the in vitro models used here provide mechanistic clarity, translating these findings to in vivo systems will require further investigation. We propose that pharmacological modulation of X could synergize with existing anti-aging strategies."

四、学科差异性

生命科学/医学：强调临床转化潜力工程/材料科学：突出技术参数优化或应用场景理论学科（如数学）：说明定理/模型的普适性

建议：下载目标期刊的3-5篇近期论文，分析其Conclusion的结构和表述习惯，模仿其风格。

通过清晰的结构、精准的语言和适度的批判性思考，Conclusion能显著提升论文的影响力。

来自 DeepSeek